deepseek-harness vs MCP Reference Servers

The best value in each numeric row is marked. Sponsorship has no effect on any of them.

Comparison of deepseek-harness vs MCP Reference Servers
Criteria deepseek-harness
2 94.7 =
MCP Reference Servers
26 91.3 =
Score 94.7 (best) 91.3
Release freshness 100.0 100.0
Adoption signals 89.4 (best) 82.6
Release freshness
Updated 5 days ago
Updated 22 days ago
Latest version v1.0.0 · 2026-09-172026.8.31 · 2026-08-31
Pricing FreeFree
License Open sourceOpen source
Platforms
API only
Linux -
Web -
Features
Integrations
Rank receipt: deepseek-harness
#2 overall · #2 in category
94.7/100
  1. Release freshness +50.0 100.0 × 50%
  2. Adoption signals +44.7 89.4 × 50%
Data from GitHub Last sync Computed on Sponsorship weight 0%, never counted Read the full formula
Rank receipt: MCP Reference Servers
#26 overall · #6 in category
91.3/100
  1. Release freshness +50.0 100.0 × 50%
  2. Adoption signals +41.3 82.6 × 50%
Data from GitHub Last sync Computed on Sponsorship weight 0%, never counted Read the full formula

Component values are before weighting. Read the full formula